Curve involved in a $9.6 million attack incident, Onekey founder calls for a fair resolution.

On June 27, Yishi, the founder of Onekey, posted about "Curve ecosystem DeFi protocol Resupply suffering a price manipulation attack resulting in a loss of 9.6 million USD," calling for Curve to provide a fair solution for every investor and to return the user funds lost due to the project party's mistakes.

Yishi stated that it is one of the three major investors in Resupply, and the losses from this attack event involve millions of dollars, causing not only significant economic losses but also immense psychological pressure. Its main stance for rights protection is that many investors, including itself, made large investments based on the credibility of Resupply being considered to have Curve; this loss was not caused by market fluctuations or bad debt events, but rather a technical failure—an ERC4626 inflation vulnerability, due to the team's failure to destroy the initial shares when deploying the new vault; the Resupply team has shifted the losses to the insurance pool depositors without any sense of responsibility. The purpose of the insurance pool is to cover black swan events and market risks, not internal negligence, and the Resupply team has never stated in the protocol that the insurance pool can bear losses caused by team errors; Curve and crvusd have gained substantial benefits from Resupply, and they should not be allowed to abandon their responsibilities. This vulnerability is not a market issue but a design and deployment flaw, and the responsibility lies with the team, not the users. The treasury of Convex or Yearn should share the responsibility.

This morning, Curve Finance made a statement regarding this security incident: "Although Resupply was not developed by Curve developers, the creators of Resupply are highly capable and experienced, and we believe they will do their utmost to resolve this issue. The affected Resupply insurance pool is designed to provide protection against such security incidents. If recovery is possible, it should be a priority and will help mitigate the overall impact of such incidents."

CRV5.74%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SilentObservervip
· 06-30 07:35
What else can I say? Play people for suckers and then run away.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecordervip
· 06-29 23:13
Sigh, another one who got Clip Coupons.
View OriginalReply0
ContractTestervip
· 06-29 09:17
Who hasn't done a good job on the Code Review now?
View OriginalReply0
TopEscapeArtistvip
· 06-27 09:16
Bullish Tied Up, losing money, brothers.
View OriginalReply0
YieldHuntervip
· 06-27 09:12
actually, another defi hack... looking at the risk metrics, this was inevitable smh
Reply0
GmGnSleepervip
· 06-27 09:10
Lost a k of w~ so refreshing
View OriginalReply0
SellTheBouncevip
· 06-27 09:07
Don't overthink it; Rug Pull is obviously the safest option.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedNotStirredvip
· 06-27 08:55
Aha, getting hit is always so skillful.
View OriginalReply0
StakeTillRetirevip
· 06-27 08:48
What is the bottom line of society?
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)